Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39897892›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2025

The water quality of the Upper Citarum: Applying the overall index of pollution, Said-WQI, and pollution index methods.

Mariana Marselina, Nurul Aulia Rahmi, Siti Ai Nurhayati

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mariana MarselinaFaculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Bandung Institute of Technology, Bandung, Indonesia.
Nurul Aulia RahmiFaculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Bandung Institute of Technology, Bandung, Indonesia.
Siti Ai NurhayatiFaculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Bandung Institute of Technology, Bandung, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Water is a crucial natural resource, integral to sustaining human life and environmental equilibrium. However, water quality remains a critical issue issue due to prevailing contamination. While river water is a primary source of raw drinking water, much of it, such as Indonesia's Citarum River in West Java, has been polluted. While studies in Indonesia using the Water Quality Index (WQI) are limited, various measurement methods have been developed globally to evaluate water quality. This research compares three methods - the Overall Index of Pollution (OIP), Said-WQI method, and Pollution Index (PI) - to assess the water quality of Upstream Citarum River. The research utilized both primary and secondary data derived from Citarum River samples. Additionally, analytical tools including Microsoft Excel, Geographic Information System (GIS), and SPSS, were used for data processing, rainfall analysis, and statistical testing, respectively. Results from four river-monitoring points indicated average values for key parameters such as biochemical oxygen demand, dissolved oxygen (DO), and total and fecal coliform, falling below established quality standards. WQI measurements revealed variable degrees of pollution in the Upstream Citarum River according to the method used. The OIP and Said-WQI methods categorized the river's status as ranging from 'good' to 'poor', while the PI method classified it from 'mildly polluted' to 'severely polluted'. Seasonal analysis of wet and dry months using secondary data revealed OIP index values ranging from 3.71 to 11.20, classifying water quality as "poor" to "moderate". The Said-WQI method yielded values between 0.67 and 2.34, indicating "poor" to "good" quality, while the PI method produced values from 4.15 to 8.13, denoting "moderately polluted" to "heavily polluted" conditions. Spatial analysis showed that upstream conditions were better than downstream conditions. The OIP index ranged from 3.71 upstream to 11.20 downstream with a classification of "poor" to "good". The Said-WQI index ranged from 0.67 upstream to 2.34 downstream, classified as - "poor" to "good". Similarly, the PI index ranged from 4.15 upstream to 8.13 downstream, indicating "moderately polluted" to "severely polluted" conditions. These findings from secondary data were corroborated by primary field sampling results. This study successfully evaluated the water quality of the Upper Citarum River by comparing measurement data with established standards across various locations and time periods. Furthermore, it conducted a comparative analysis of the differences between the three indices, focusing on parameters, sub-index transformations, weighting, and aggregation processes.

Indexed as

OIPPollution index (PI)Said-WQIUpstream CitarumWater quality index

Identifiers

PMID39897892
PMCPMC11787455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.