ArticleHeliyon2025
Deep learning-based prediction of mortality using brain midline shift and clinical information.
Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The role of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and prognosis of traumatic brain injury based on brain CT scans: a systematic review.Neurosurgical review · 2026Pooled it
- Assessment value of blood pressure variability combined with serum tau protein for the prognosis of patients with traumatic brain injury.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain midline shift (MLS) indicates the severity of mass effect from intracranial lesions such as traumatic brain injury, stroke, brain tumor, or hematoma. Brain MLS can be used to determine whether patients require emergency surgery and to predict patients' prognosis. Since brain MLS is usually emergent, it must be diagnosed immediately. Therefore, this study presents a computer-aided deep-learning method for detecting MLS, aiming to predict mortality in a prognosis-predicting cohort using brain MLS and clinical in-formation. The brain midline is a 3-dimensional structure, but computed tomography (CT) slices are 2-dimensional which limits brain MLS detection. Here we propose a keypoint detection method to detect brain midline on each CT slice, acquiring brain MLS distance and area in each slice. Combined with clinical information, patient mortality can be predicted using the multilayer perceptron (MLP) model. The accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score for slice selection with the proposed model are 0.966, 0.952, 0.991, 0.932, and 0.971, respectively. Both MLS distance and volume were precisely predicted at slice-level and case-level with only the slightest error. The detected midlines were clearly separated into left and right brain with a dice coefficient of 0.98. The accuracy and AUC of the MLP model were both above 0.8. The model detected large brain MLS cases well in the prediction of outcomes in the prognosis-predicting cohort. The method performs well on slice selection and brain MLS detection, and predictions of MLS distance and volume combined with clinical information predicts the patient's prognosis well.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.