ArticleHeliyon2025
Time pressure in surgical teams, a help or a hindrance to patient safety?
Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patient safety requires mindful routines in the operating room. Usually, time pressure is presented as an unavoidable constraint to mindful routines and a consequence of workload imposed on teams. We aim to understand time pressure and how it interacts with developing mindful routines. Methods: This naturalistic case study was conducted with a surgical team in a Dutch academic hospital using ethnographic methods including participant observation, interviews, and fieldnotes. The researcher observed the team for 103 h. Our analysis integrates habit theory and mindful organising principles. Results: Team culture reflected deference to speed, preoccupation with productivity, conflict avoidance, and value on affective relationships. Conflicting priorities arose from differences in safety norms, worries about time, and beliefs about what saves time. Addressing these conflicting priorities, however, was rare. Creating shared Situational Awareness (SA) helped prevent or mitigate time pressure, though it was not a consistently embedded routine. New routines were often compromised under time pressure, while established habits showed resilience to time constraints. Conclusions: Rather than being workload-driven, time pressure emerged as a co-constructed outcome of conflicting priorities and the preservation of affective relationships. The imperative to save time motivated shared situational awareness and the formation of new mindful routines. We recommend enhancing mindful routines by refining current practices in mortality and morbidity meetings, expanding stakeholder involvement, and addressing prevailing concerns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.