Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39897829›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2025

An evaluation of osseous regeneration capability of novel autogenous tooth graft along with orthobiologics for long bone segmental defects.

N Hussain, M A Khan, A K Mahmood, M Y Tipu, S Aslam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

N HussainDepartment of Veterinary Surgery, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences Lahore, 54000, Pakistan.
M A KhanDepartment of Veterinary Surgery, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences Lahore, 54000, Pakistan.
A K MahmoodDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences Lahore, 54000, Pakistan.
M Y TipuDepartment of Pathology, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences Lahore, 54000, Pakistan.
S AslamDepartment of Veterinary Surgery, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences Lahore, 54000, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracted tooth, is predominantly considered a medical waste but tooth and bone evince similitude in biochemical composition, so tooth may be considered as bone graft material. We selected twenty-four adult rabbits with age and body weight ranges of 1-3 years and 2-4 kg respectively, regardless of sex and breed. These rabbits were allocated into four groups i.e., J, K, L, and M. Autogenous tooth graft was acquired from the individual's incisor. In group J (control), tooth graft alone was used at the mid shaft radius fractured site. For group K, tooth and bone marrow aspirate (BMA) were applied. In group L, tooth-platelet rich plasma (PRP) was administered while for group M, tooth-decellularized fish scale (DFS) was engrafted at the location. The research was conducted for 4 months and parameter evaluation was done on 0, 1st, 7th, 15th, 30th, 45th, 60th, 75th, 90th, 105th and 120th days. The therapeutic regimens were extensively appraised in terms of physiological vitals, hematology, serology, bone biomarkers, mechanical assessment, radiography and histomorphometric parameters. We noticed appropriate osteointegration of autologous tooth with the fractured site, good healing and bone remodeling in all groups with superior to lower trends in Tooth-BMA, Tooth-PRP, Tooth-DFS, and Tooth-solo groups respectively. Though usage of aforementioned regimens

Indexed as

Autogenous toothBone graftingBone-marrow aspirateDecellularized fish scalesOrthobiologicsPlatelet rich plasma

Identifiers

PMID39897829
PMCPMC11787641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.