ArticleHeliyon2025
A convolutional autoencoder framework for ECG signal analysis.
Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reassessing negative 24 h pH impedance tests for hidden gastroesophageal reflux disease using multi feature anomaly detection.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electrocardiographic (ECG) signals are used to evaluate heart activity and to identify disease-related anomalies. Reliable support systems are useful for analyzing ECG signals, for instance, in long-term data acquisition and evaluation (e.g., 24-hour holter recording) or to support physicians in reading ECGs. Analysis of time varying signals may be done by using autoencoders (AEs) deep neural networks. AE specialized for signal data, named Convolutional Autoencoder (CAE), showed the best performances in the analysis of ECG signals. This paper presents a CAE-based framework for ECG signal analysis and anomaly identification. The trained phase is performed on synthetic data signals. The trained neural network obtained is used for the detection of anomalies in ECG signals. The trained framework has been tested on 12 lead ECG signals on a benchmark dataset and applied in scenarios where anomalies are related to cardiological risks and pathologies. The results show interesting results in automatic anomaly detection to support physicians in the decision process. The results show that the CAE-based framework is able to identify anomalies in ECG signals with a ROC AUC of 97.82% on simulated test set and a ROC AUC of 99.75% using a real test set. Finally, the proposed method has been enriched by means of reconstruction error based explainability modules and time-windows based preprocessing modules. Explainability results have been validated using abnormalities annotated by a cardiologist as ground truth and compared with explainations results. System with both code and data, is available at https://github.com/UgoLomoio/ECG_DSS_CAE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.