Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39897804›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2025

The impact of biofeedback in enhancing chronic pain rehabilitation: A systematic review of mechanisms and outcomes.

Andrea Calderone, Vincenza Maura Mazzurco Masi, Rosaria De Luca, Antonio Gangemi, Mirjam Bonanno, Daniela Floridia, Francesco Corallo, Giovanni Morone, Angelo Quartarone, Maria Grazia Maggio and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Andrea CalderoneDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Piazza Pugliatti, 1, 98122, Messina, Italy.
Vincenza Maura Mazzurco MasiUniversità Degli Studi di Palermo, Piazza Marina, 61, 90133, Palermo, Italy.
Rosaria De LucaIRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo, S.S. 113 Via Palermo, C.da Casazza, 98124, Messina, Italy.
Antonio GangemiIRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo, S.S. 113 Via Palermo, C.da Casazza, 98124, Messina, Italy.
Mirjam BonannoIRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo, S.S. 113 Via Palermo, C.da Casazza, 98124, Messina, Italy.
Daniela FloridiaIRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo, S.S. 113 Via Palermo, C.da Casazza, 98124, Messina, Italy.
Francesco CoralloIRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo, S.S. 113 Via Palermo, C.da Casazza, 98124, Messina, Italy.
Giovanni MoroneDepartment of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, 67100, L'Aquila, Italy.
Angelo QuartaroneIRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo, S.S. 113 Via Palermo, C.da Casazza, 98124, Messina, Italy.
Maria Grazia MaggioIRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo, S.S. 113 Via Palermo, C.da Casazza, 98124, Messina, Italy.
Rocco Salvatore CalabròIRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo, S.S. 113 Via Palermo, C.da Casazza, 98124, Messina, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objectives: Chronic pain (CP), affecting approximately 20 % of adults globally, imposes a profound burden on individuals and healthcare systems. This condition, characterized by persistent pain, muscle stiffness, and emotional distress, often results in a complex interplay of physical and psychological factors that exacerbate symptoms and hinder recovery. Biofeedback (BFB), a non-invasive intervention, offers a promising rehabilitation strategy by enabling individuals to monitor and self-regulate physiological responses, such as muscle tension, heart rate, and skin temperature. Through this process, BFB disrupts the vicious cycle of pain and stress, fostering relaxation, reducing muscle strain, and alleviating emotional distress. This systematic review aimed to examine the mechanisms underlying BFB's therapeutic effects in CP rehabilitation, specifically its ability to enhance self-regulation and promote relaxation to improve pain control. Furthermore, it aimed to evaluate the impact of BFB on key outcomes, including pain severity, functional capabilities, and quality of life, with the goal of guiding its integration into contemporary rehabilitation practices. Materials and Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase (2014-2024) to identify studies on BFB for CP. Inclusion criteria included original research involving BFB as a primary or secondary intervention for CP, with outcomes related to pain management and rehabilitation. This review is registered on Open OSF (X5HPB). Results: BFB has shown consistent efficacy as a complementary therapy in CP management, offering significant reductions in pain intensity and enhancements in quality of life across diverse CP conditions. Mechanistically, BFB facilitates improved self-regulation by training patients to modulate physiological responses, such as muscle tension and heart rate variability, leading to better pain control and stress reduction. Conclusions: BFB shows significant promise as a supplementary treatment for different CP disorders. The evidence that was examined shows that it is effective in improving how pain is perceived, increasing functional results, and boosting overall quality of life among a variety of patient groups.

Indexed as

BiofeedbackChronic painNeurorehabilitationPain managementPatient outcomesTherapeutic interventions

Identifiers

PMID39897804
PMCPMC11783006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.