Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39897790›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2025

Groundwater quality and associated health risks in the Eastern Region of Ghana.

Thomas Acquah, Miriam Appiah-Brempong, Geophrey Kwame Anornu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thomas AcquahRegional Water and Environmental Sanitation Centre, Kumasi, Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.
Miriam Appiah-BrempongRegional Water and Environmental Sanitation Centre, Kumasi, Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.
Geophrey Kwame AnornuRegional Water and Environmental Sanitation Centre, Kumasi, Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the Eastern Region of Ghana, 95 % of residents have access to boreholes. However, approximately 30 % of these boreholes are characterized by unpleasurable taste, odour, oily scum and particulate matter. Thus, this study aimed to assess water quality, predict the sources of groundwater contaminants, evaluate the human health risk and to generate spatial distribution and health risk maps. In achieving this, the water quality of 136 boreholes in the region was evaluated through Water Quality Index (WQI) and Groundwater Pollution Index (GPI) analyses. Multivariate statistical procedures, namely, principal component and correlation analyses were employed to define the major groundwater pollutants and their possible sources. Non-carcinogenic health risk to infants, children and adults through nitrates, iron, manganese and fluorides ingestion was also assessed. The results revealed that groundwater in the region is generally slightly acidic with a mean pH of 6.30. WQI analysis grouped 68 % of the groundwater samples under the 'excellent' and 'good' water types with the remaining percent categorized under 'poor', 'very poor' and 'unsafe' drinking water types. GPI analysis classified 95 %, 2.21 % and 2.79 % of the boreholes as 'insignificant', 'low' and 'highly' polluted zones. From the multivariate analyses, the dominant pollutants were iron, manganese, chlorides, sodium, fluorides, potassium, turbidity, total suspended and dissolved solids, hardness, alkalinity, sulphates, nitrates and phosphates. The sources of these contaminants are primarily from rock-water interactions and fertilizers. Health risk assessment for nitrates, fluorides, iron and manganese ingestion revealed that 23, 17 and 15 boreholes in the region are likely to pose non-carcinogenic health risk to infants, children and adults respectively. Health risk maps indicated that the most vulnerable districts were Atiwa East, Fanteakwa North, Achiase, Birim South, Akwapim, Suhum and Ayensuano. From these findings, it is imperative that appropriate groundwater remediation measures are implemented in the region to protect public health.

Indexed as

FluorideGroundwater pollution indexHealth risk mapsPrincipal component analysisWater quality index

Identifiers

PMID39897790
PMCPMC11786682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.