ReviewHeliyon2025
Drug delivery strategies to improve the treatment of corneal disorders.
Review in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing Treatment of Degenerative Eye Diseases at the Nanoscale.Smart medicine · 2026Review
- Optimization and formulation of cyclosporine-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) for the management of dry eye syndrome by using centre composite design approaches.International ophthalmology · 2026Article
- EDAC-mediated O-acylisourea rearrangement for tertiary amine cationization of hyaluronic acid (HA) and its application as structural backbones in virus-inspired polyplexes.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- Recent Advances in Artificial Intelligence and Nanotechnology-Driven Strategies for Diagnosis and Therapy of Ocular Diseases.Current drug delivery · 2026Review
- Nanovesicular Drug Delivery Systems for Rare Ocular Diseases: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2025Review
- Development and Evaluation of Cyclosporine a Mixed Micelle Eye Drops for Enhanced Ocular Drug Delivery.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anterior eye disorders including dry eye syndrome, keratitis, chemical burns, and trauma have varying prevalence rates in the world. Classical dosage forms based-topical ophthalmic drugs are popular treatments for managing corneal diseases. However, current dosage forms of ocular drugs can be associated with major challenges such as the short retention time in the presence of ocular barriers. Developing alternative therapeutic methods is required to overcome drug bioavailability from ocular barriers. Nanocarriers are major platforms and promising candidates for the administration of ophthalmic drugs in an adjustable manner. This paper briefly introduces the advantages, disadvantages, and characteristics of delivery systems for the treatment of corneal diseases. Additionally, advanced technologies such as 3D printing are being considered to fabricate ocular drug carriers and determine drug dosages for personalized treatment. This comprehensive review is gathered through multiple databases such as Google Scholar, PubMed, and Web of Science. It explores information around "ocular drug delivery systems'', "nano-based drug delivery systems'', "engineered nanocarriers'', and "advanced technologies to fabricate personalized drug delivery systems''.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.