ArticleHeliyon2025
Enhanced extreme learning machine via competitive learning SSA (CL-SSA) for load capacity factor prediction.
Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extreme Learning Machine (ELM) is known for its fast training speed and simplicity of implementation; however, it suffers from certain limitations, including sensitivity to random initialization and inadequate weight optimization, which can result in suboptimal accuracy and precision. This study introduces an enhanced Competitive Learning Salp Swarm Algorithm (CLSSA), which integrates the Salp Swarm Algorithm (SSA) with Competitive Swarm Optimization (CSO) to improve the exploitation capabilities of the traditional CSO. The goal is to address the limitations of traditional ELM by optimizing the weights and biases of the network more effectively, thereby improving the precision and convergence speed of ELM. The research first evaluates the efficiency of the improvement made to the CLSSA optimizer in comparison with various optimization methods, using CEC 2015 benchmark functions to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed improvements. The results show that CLSSA outperforms other optimizers in 86 % of the CEC 2015 functions, underscoring its superior optimization capabilities. Furthermore, the study assesses the effectiveness of the CLSSA-enhanced ELM (ELM-CLSSA) in predicting the load capacity factor. The findings reveal that the hybrid ELM-CLSSA framework significantly outperforms both alternative approaches and the traditional ELM framework in terms of training and prediction accuracy, achieving an impressive accuracy rate of 97%. The algorithm's rapid convergence, high precision, and ability to avoid local optima make it a promising solution for complex problems, such as load capacity factor prediction, which is critical for environmentally sustainable initiatives. In addition, the feature analysis conducted by ELM-CLSSA provides valuable insights into the key variables influencing load capacity factor prediction, highlighting the importance of factors such as coal energy, economic growth, technological innovation, and biomass. This study advocates for the use of the ELM-CLSSA framework to improve the precision and reliability of load capacity factor prediction, offering a valuable tool for scientists and policymakers in their efforts to promote ecological conservation and combat climate change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.