ArticleIEEE sensors journal2024
Adaptive Machine Learning Head Model Across Different Head Impact Types Using Unsupervised Domain Adaptation and Generative Adversarial Networks.
Article in IEEE sensors journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantifying Morphology-Related Deviations in Brain Strain Using an Automated Mesh Morphing Method.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- The Impact of Drop Test Conditions on Brain Strain Location and Severity: A Novel Approach Using a Deep Learning Model.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Machine learning head models (MLHMs) are developed to estimate brain deformation from sensor-based kinematics for early detection of traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, the overfitting to simulated impacts and the decreasing accuracy caused by distributional shift of different head impact datasets hinders the broad clinical applications of current MLHMs. We propose a new MLHM configuration that integrates unsupervised domain adaptation with a deep neural network to predict whole-brain maximum principal strain (MPS) and MPS rate (MPSR). With 12,780 simulated head impacts, we performed unsupervised domain adaptation on target head impacts from 302 college football (CF) impacts and 457 mixed martial arts (MMA) impacts using domain regularized component analysis (DRCA) and cycle-GAN-based methods. The new model improved the MPS/MPSR estimation accuracy, with the DRCA method outperforming other domain adaptation methods in prediction accuracy: MPS mean absolute error (MAE): 0.017 (CF) and 0.020 (MMA); MPSR MAE: 4.09 s
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.