ReviewMethodsX2025
Toward evidence-informed medical curricula: A scoping review protocol on social skills and emotional regulation.
Review in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Medical education is considered psychologically challenging, and medical students often report higher levels of psychological distress compared to non-medical students and the general population. This scoping review aims to identify and map the available scientific evidence on social skills and emotional regulation in medical students, characterize existing studies, identify knowledge gaps, and provide a synthesis of evidence to inform educational practice and curriculum development. This scoping review will follow the methodological frameworks proposed by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) and the PRISMA-ScR checklist. Relevant studies will be searched in electronic databases (EMBASE, ERIC, PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, and Web of Science) and gray literature sources. The search strategy will use descriptors in English, Portuguese, and Spanish, combined with Boolean operators. Two reviewers will independently screen titles, abstracts, and full-texts for inclusion. Data will be extracted using a standardized form and synthesized narratively. Qualitative and quantitative analyses, including thematic analysis and meta-analysis analysis (if appropriate), will be employed to provide a comprehensive overview of the evidence. The review will provide a comprehensive overview of the available scientific evidence on social skills and emotional regulation in medical students, identifying study characteristics, knowledge gaps, and areas for future research. The findings of this scoping review may inform educational practice and guide the development of strategies to promote the well-being and performance of medical students by addressing social skills and emotional regulation in medical curricula. The review protocol will be registered in the Open Science Framework (OSF).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.