ArticleMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids2025
Clinical trial to compare safety and tolerability between intravenous infusion and bolus intravenous injection of ApTOLL in healthy volunteers.
Article in Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05569720 (First in Human Clinical Trial to Compare Safety and Tolerability Between Intravenous Infusions and Bolus Intravenous Inhection of ApTOLL in Healthy Volunteers), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
First in Human Clinical Trial to Compare Safety and Tolerability Between Intravenous Infusions and Bolus Intravenous Inhection of ApTOLL in Healthy Volunteers
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Barcoded oligonucleotide system (BOLT) for targeted organ delivery.Bioactive materials · 2027Article
- Back Again to the Future: A New Era for Cerebroprotection.Annals of neurology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ApTOLL, a new modulator of Toll-like receptor 4, has demonstrated safety and efficacy in healthy subjects and in stroke patients; however, the route of administration used so far (30 min infusion) can potentially be an issue in the acute stroke units where "time is brain." To safely reduce the time of administration in future clinical trials, a dose-ascending, open-label, phase I clinical trial was conducted in healthy subjects. The objective was to assess the safety and pharmacokinetics of ApTOLL when comparing intravenous infusion (30 min) vs. bolus intravenous injection (1-3 min). The study was divided into three periods: (1) volunteers received 0.1 mg/kg of ApTOLL as a slow intravenous infusion, (2) 0.1 mg/kg of ApTOLL was administered as a single bolus, and (3) subjects received 0.2 mg/kg as a single bolus injection. No adverse events related to ApTOLL administration at any dosing pattern were reported. Maximum concentration was detected at the end of the infusion/injection, and mean half-life was 9.5 h for both routes of administration. These results show that safety and pharmacokinetic profiles were comparable between intravenous infusion and bolus injection of ApTOLL, supporting a change of the route of administration for future clinical practice (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05569720).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.