Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39897575›Full record

ArticleMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids2025

Clinical trial to compare safety and tolerability between intravenous infusion and bolus intravenous injection of ApTOLL in healthy volunteers.

Macarena Hernández-Jiménez, Samuel Martín-Vílchez, Gina Mejía-Abril, Manuel Roman, Sergio Luquero-Bueno, David Piñeiro, Marc Ribó, Francisco Abad-Santos, Dolores Ochoa

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05569720 (First in Human Clinical Trial to Compare Safety and Tolerability Between Intravenous Infusions and Bolus Intravenous Inhection of ApTOLL in Healthy Volunteers), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05569720 phase1completednot on this map

First in Human Clinical Trial to Compare Safety and Tolerability Between Intravenous Infusions and Bolus Intravenous Inhection of ApTOLL in Healthy Volunteers

TypeinterventionalSponsoraptaTargets S.L.Ran2022 to 2022Enrolled6ConditionsStrokeArmsApTOLL
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Macarena Hernández-JiménezAptaTargets S.L., Avda. Cardenal Herrera Oria 298, 28035 Madrid, Spain.
Samuel Martín-VílchezClinical Pharmacology Department, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Princesa (IP), 28006 Madrid, Spain.
Gina Mejía-AbrilClinical Pharmacology Department, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Princesa (IP), 28006 Madrid, Spain.
Manuel RomanClinical Pharmacology Department, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Princesa (IP), 28006 Madrid, Spain.
Sergio Luquero-BuenoClinical Pharmacology Department, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Princesa (IP), 28006 Madrid, Spain.
David PiñeiroAptaTargets S.L., Avda. Cardenal Herrera Oria 298, 28035 Madrid, Spain.
Marc RibóAptaTargets S.L., Avda. Cardenal Herrera Oria 298, 28035 Madrid, Spain.
Francisco Abad-SantosClinical Pharmacology Department, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Princesa (IP), 28006 Madrid, Spain.
Dolores OchoaClinical Pharmacology Department, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Princesa (IP), 28006 Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ApTOLL, a new modulator of Toll-like receptor 4, has demonstrated safety and efficacy in healthy subjects and in stroke patients; however, the route of administration used so far (30 min infusion) can potentially be an issue in the acute stroke units where "time is brain." To safely reduce the time of administration in future clinical trials, a dose-ascending, open-label, phase I clinical trial was conducted in healthy subjects. The objective was to assess the safety and pharmacokinetics of ApTOLL when comparing intravenous infusion (30 min) vs. bolus intravenous injection (1-3 min). The study was divided into three periods: (1) volunteers received 0.1 mg/kg of ApTOLL as a slow intravenous infusion, (2) 0.1 mg/kg of ApTOLL was administered as a single bolus, and (3) subjects received 0.2 mg/kg as a single bolus injection. No adverse events related to ApTOLL administration at any dosing pattern were reported. Maximum concentration was detected at the end of the infusion/injection, and mean half-life was 9.5 h for both routes of administration. These results show that safety and pharmacokinetic profiles were comparable between intravenous infusion and bolus injection of ApTOLL, supporting a change of the route of administration for future clinical practice (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05569720).

Indexed as

aptamerclinical trialhealthy subjectsinflammationMT: Oligonucleotides: Therapies and ApplicationspharmacokineticssafetyTLR4

Identifiers

PMID39897575
PMCPMC11786813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.