ReviewTheranostics2025
Stimulus-responsive smart bioactive glass composites for repair of complex tissue defects.
Review in Theranostics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ultrasound-Triggered Gelation for Restoring Biomechanical Properties of Degenerated Functional Spinal Units.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Mesoporous Bioactive Glasses: A Powerful Tool in Tissue Engineering and Drug Delivery.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Transforming therapeutics through biomaterials: A comprehensive insight into biomaterials' role in effective drug delivery and healthcare advancement.Biomaterials translational · 2026Review
- Rat Calvarial Guided Bone Regeneration Model: Preclinical Insights into Biomaterials, Barrier Design, and Systemic Modulators.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Smart biomaterials with active environmental responsiveness have attracted widespread attention in recent years. Previous studies on bioactive glass (BG) have mainly focused on the property of bioactivity, while little attention has been paid to the property of smart response of BG. Herein, we propose the concept of Smart Bioactive Glass Composites (SBGC) which are capable of actively responding to the endogenous disease microenvironment or exogenous physical stimuli, thereby enabling active treatment of tissue defect sites and ultimately promoting tissue regeneration. In this review, the response characteristics of SBGC to different internal and external environments are described. Subsequently, the applications of SBGC in complex tissue defect repair of tumors, infections, and diabetes are reviewed. By deeply analyzing the recent progress of SBGC in different fields, this review will point out the direction for the research of next-generation BG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.