ArticlePeerJ2025
Correction factors for prey size estimation from PenguCams.
Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of animal-borne cameras enables scientists to observe behaviours and interactions that have until now, gone unseen or rarely documented. Researchers can now analyse prey preferences and predator-prey interactions with a new level of detail. New technology allows researchers to analyse prey features before they are captured, adding a new dimension to existing prey analysis techniques, which have primarily relied on examining partially or fully digested prey through stomach flushing. To determine prey size, the video footage captured needs a correction factor (pixel:mm ratio) that allows researchers to measure prey dimensions using image measuring software and convert the pixels to actual measurements. This in turn will help estimating the prey energy content. This method requires a reference object with known dimensions (such as beak measurements) to ground truth your distance. Using PenguCams we determined the correction factor by measuring a 2 cm section of 1 mm grid paper from video footage taken at known distances (10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60 cm) in different salinities ranging from air and fresh water, up to 35 psu in 5 psu increments while controlling for temperature and pressure. We found no significant difference between correction factors of water at different salinities. However, due to their considerable differences in refraction index, correction factors contrast between water and air. Linear equations modelled from correction factors at tested distances help predict correction factors between tested distances and, therefore, enable a wider application of this research. We provide examples from PenguCam footage taken of Humboldt (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.