Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39897486›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2025

Syed Zubairuddin Ahmed, Abdul Samad Khan, Maram Alshehri, Fatimah Alsebaa, Fadak Almutawah, Moayad Mohammed Aljeshi, Asma Tufail Shah, Budi Aslinie Md Sabri, Sultan Akhtar, Mohamed Ibrahim Abu Hassan

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Syed Zubairuddin AhmedDepartment of Restorative Dental Sciences College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-7259-5141
Abdul Samad KhanDepartment of Restorative Dental Sciences College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-2165-800X
Maram AlshehriImam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, College of Dentistry, Dammam, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia.
Fatimah AlsebaaImam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, College of Dentistry, Dammam, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia.
Fadak AlmutawahImam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, College of Dentistry, Dammam, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia.
Moayad Mohammed AljeshiImam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, College of Dentistry, Dammam, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia.
Asma Tufail ShahInterdisciplinary Research Centre in Biomedical Materials (IRCBM), COMSATS University Islamabad, Lahore Campus, Pakistan.
Budi Aslinie Md SabriFaculty of Dentistry, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Sungai Buloh, Slengor, Malaysia.
Sultan AkhtarDepartment of Biophysics, Institute for Research and Medical Consultations, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-9473-4739
Mohamed Ibrahim Abu HassanFaculty of Dentistry, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Sungai Buloh, Slengor, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Teeth with small to moderate cavities can be repaired with enamel resin infiltrants, a form of dental restorative material. In dental materials, it is standard practice to include several filler particles for experimental use in dental resin infiltrates. The resin's BG particles penetrate the lesion and release ions that combine with saliva to provide a mineral-rich environment that can strengthen enamel and heal. This study aimed to compare resin infiltrants based on three types of bioactive glass materials and investigate the penetration depth, microleakage, and the effect of thermal and chemical aging. Methodology: A triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) and urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA)-based experimental resin infiltrate was prepared. Initial mixing was done manually for 1 h at room temperature, followed by another mix for 30 min on a magnetic stirrer. This prepared resin, called "PURE RESIN" was then further incorporated with three different types of bioactive glasses, Results: The F-BG group achieved the highest initial and day 14 penetration coefficients. There was a superior dye penetration with the microleakage analysis in the F-BG group. The 45S5 group had the highest average penetration depth Conclusion: The F-BG group achieved the highest initial and day 14 penetration coefficients. There was a superior dye penetration with the microleakage analysis in the F-BG group. The 45S5 group had the highest average penetration depth

Indexed as

CeramicsComposite ResinsDental MaterialsGlassHumansIn Vitro TechniquesMaterials TestingMethacrylatesPolyethylene GlycolsPolymethacrylic AcidsPolyurethanesTemperaturebioactive glass 45S5BioglassComposite ResinsDental MaterialsMethacrylatesPolyethylene GlycolsPolymethacrylic AcidsPolyurethanestriethylene glycol dimethacrylateurethane dimethacrylate luting resinBioactive glassChemical agingMicro-CTMicrohardnessMicroleakagepH-cyclingResin infiltrantSurface roughnessThermo-cyclingWhite spot lesions

Identifiers

PMID39897486
PMCPMC11784535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.