ArticleCardiology research2025
Characterization of Intracardiac Flow in the Right Ventricle With Pressure and Volume Overload in Children.
Article in Cardiology research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Quantitative assessment of systolic and diastolic left ventricular energy loss using vector flow mapping in healthy participants: a retrospective observational study.Cardiovascular ultrasound · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Blood flow visualization using vector flow mapping (VFM) holds potential as a novel indicator of right ventricular (RV) function. Methods: This study included 12 patients with atrial septal defect (ASD group, mean (± standard deviation) age: 6.2 ± 1.5 years), six patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH group, mean age: 6.8 ± 2.3 years), and 35 healthy, age-matched children (control group, mean age: 7.3 ± 1.6 years). VFM data were obtained from the parasternal RV short-axis view. Results: VFM images in the majority of the control group showed a counterclockwise rotating vortex below the tricuspid anterior leaflet and clockwise vortex below the septal leaflet in early diastole. In late diastole, a clockwise vortex flow appeared at the RV apex to the outflow tract. In the ASD and PH groups, the formation of vortical flow below the tricuspid valve was decreased. Late-diastolic vortices also differed from the control group, with counterclockwise or no vortex flow seen in this phase in these groups. Flow energy loss (EL), kinetic energy (KE) and energetic performance index (EPI) were related to RV systolic and diastolic functions. Mean EL over one cardiac cycle (ELcycle) was significantly higher in the PH group than in the control group (P = 0.0471). KE of the RV inflow tract (KE-RVin) and outflow tract (KE-RVout) were significantly lower in the PH group than in the control and ASD groups (P < 0.05 each). Conclusions: These results suggest that RV vortex formation may be a factor in efficient ejection. EL, KE, and EPI may be applicable to evaluate RV contractility and diastolic function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.