Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39897432›Full record

ArticleJournal of nanotheranostics2023

Enhancing Antibody Exposure in the Central Nervous System: Mechanisms of Uptake, Clearance, and Strategies for Improved Brain Delivery.

Kelly Schwinghamer, Teruna J Siahaan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nanotheranostics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kelly SchwinghamerDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66046, USA.
Teruna J SiahaanDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66046, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7250-0627

Funding

Reshaping ApoE4 and Alzheimer's Brains with ApoE2R01AG071682 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI TERUNA J. SIAHAAN, Liqin Zhao · 2022 to 2026
$3.4M
A Novel Method to Enhance Drug Delivery to the BrainR01AG082273 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI KRZYSZTOF KUCZERA, TERUNA J. SIAHAAN · 2024 to 2026
$1.4M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG071682NIA NIH HHS R01 AG082273
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibodies (mAbs) are attractive molecules for their application as a diagnostic and therapeutic agent for diseases of the central nervous system (CNS). mAbs can be generated to have high affinity and specificity to target molecules in the CNS. Unfortunately, only a very small number of mAbs have been specifically developed and approved for neurological indications. This is primarily attributed to their low exposure within the CNS, hindering their ability to reach and effectively engage their potential targets in the brain. This review discusses aspects of various barriers such as the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and blood-cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) barrier (BCSFB) that regulate the entry and clearance of mAbs into and from the brain. The roles of the glymphatic system on brain exposure and clearance are being described. We also discuss the proposed mechanisms of the uptake of mAbs into the brain and for clearance. Finally, several methods of enhancing the exposure of mAbs in the CNS were discussed, including receptor-mediated transcytosis, osmotic BBB opening, focused ultrasound (FUS), BBB-modulating peptides, and enhancement of mAb brain retention.

Indexed as

BBBBCSFBglymphatic systemmAb brain clearancemAb brain delivery methodsmAb brain retentionmechanism of mAb uptake

Identifiers

PMID39897432
PMCPMC11784990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.