ArticleFrontiers in molecular biosciences2025
Global trends and emerging insights in BRAF and MEK inhibitor resistance in melanoma: a bibliometric analysis.
Article in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeting MAPK Pathways in Skin, Thyroid, and Pancreatic Cancer: A Perspective on Synthetic Inhibitors and Natural Modulators.Advanced biology · 2026Review
- A Modular and Programmable Cas13d Platform for RNA Single Nucleotide Variant Detection.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- BRAF inhibitor resistance in melanoma: from resistance mechanisms to therapeutic innovations.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- Malignant Melanoma: Landscape of Molecular Markers.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Autophagy and mitophagy in dermatological disease: a comprehensive review from molecular pathways to therapeutic frontiers.Biology direct · 2025Review
- Hybrid chalcone-pyrazoline derivatives: synthesis and in silico evaluation for anticancer potential.Future medicinal chemistry · 2025Article
- Global research trends and emerging themes in osteosarcoma metabolomics: a bibliometric and visualization analysis.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to perform a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of global research on BRAF and MEK inhibitor resistance in melanoma, identifying key research trends, influential contributors, and emerging themes from 2003 to 2024. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database to retrieve publications related to BRAF and MEK inhibitor resistance from 1 January 2003, to 1 September 2024. Bibliometric analyses, including publication trends, citation networks, and keyword co-occurrence patterns, were performed using VOSviewer and CiteSpace. Collaborative networks, co-cited references, and keyword burst analyses were mapped to uncover shifts in research focus and global cooperation. Results: A total of 3,503 documents, including 2,781 research articles and 722 review papers, were analyzed, highlighting significant growth in this field. The United States, China, and Italy led in publication volume and citation impact, with Harvard University and the University of California System among the top contributing institutions. Research output showed three phases of growth, peaking in 2020. Keyword and co-citation analyses revealed a transition from early focus on BRAF mutations and MAPK pathway activation to recent emphasis on immunotherapy, combination therapies, and non-apoptotic cell death mechanisms like ferroptosis and pyroptosis. These trends reflect the evolving priorities and innovative approaches shaping the field of resistance to BRAF and MEK inhibitors in melanoma. Conclusion: Research on BRAF and MEK inhibitor resistance has evolved significantly. This analysis provides a strategic framework for future investigations, guiding the development of innovative, multi-modal approaches to improve treatment outcomes for melanoma patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.