ArticleEuropean journal of radiology open2025
Comparison of objective quality parameters between CTA and CTP angiographic reconstructions in ischemic stroke patients.
Article in European journal of radiology open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: CT perfusion-angiographic reconstructions (CTP-AR) may be used for occlusion detection in ischemic stroke patients. Objective image quality of CTP-AR needs to be evaluated before implementation as it may affect occlusion detection. In this study, we aimed to assess the objective image quality, by means of contrast to noise ratio (CNR) and signal to noise ratio (SNR), of both CT-angiography and CT perfusion-angiographic reconstructions (CTP-AR). Methods: Patients with an ischemic stroke between September 2020 up to and including September 2021 who underwent both CT perfusion and CTA at baseline were included. CTP-AR was reconstructed from 1 mm CTP series at the peak arterial enhancement. Per patient, five ipsilateral and five contralateral regions of interest (ROI) were placed. Attenuation and standard deviation per ROI were used to calculate CNR and SNR. Differences in CNR and SNR between CTA and CTP-AR were tested using paired-sample t-tests. Results: In total, 195/239 patients were included. Both on the ipsilateral and contralateral side, the CNR was significantly higher on CTP-AR compared to CTA ( Conclusion: Image quality measures of CTP-derived angiographic reconstructions indicate higher CNR compared to CTA, but a lower SNR in non-angiographic structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.