ArticleVeterinary world2024
Herd-level seroprevalence, molecular prevalence, and trends of
Article in Veterinary world, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence and Risk Factors of Q Fever in Smallholder Dairy Farms in Kenya.Veterinary medicine and science · 2026Article
- Surveillance of Q Fever in Dairy Cattle in Latvia: Molecular and Serological Findings and Association with Farm and Woodland Density.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Benchmarking Q fever transmission in czech republic and serbia: A one health sub-national population study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Seroprevalence of Q fever among humans and animals in East Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.One health outlook · 2026Review
- Nationwide serological, molecular, and spatial assessment of Q fever in dromedary camels (Veterinary world · 2026Article
- Molecular Investigation and Characterization of Enterocytozoon bieneusi, Coxiella burnetii and Dientamoeba fragilis in Raw Milk and Cheese: A First Report for Dientamoeba fragilis.Acta parasitologica · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aim: Cattle are the reservoir host of Materials and Methods: Relevant studies were retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science and then screened for possible inclusion. A random-effects model was used for all meta-analyses. Subgroup meta-analysis and meta-regression were used to explore some sources of heterogeneity associated with the pooled prevalence and to determine the trends of Results: Of the 1541 citations, 86 studies with 38,057 cattle herds from 42 countries on six continents were included in the meta-analysis. The global herd-level seroprevalence of Conclusion: The global herd-level seroprevalence and herd-level molecular prevalence of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.