ArticleCureus2025
The Steroid Veil: Complications in Identifying Lupus.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While topical steroids are an invaluable tool used for the treatment of pruritic rashes, they can also complicate attempts at a definitive diagnosis. The temporal association between steroid use and biopsy must be taken into account when investigating the underlying etiology of such rashes. In patients with a history of dermatologic disease with the onset of a new rash, management should include a biopsy, if deemed necessary for diagnosis, followed by a prescription of topical steroids for symptomatic treatment. A 63-year-old male with a history of psoriasis presented with a new-onset pruritic, erythematous-to-violaceous rash on sun-exposed areas. The final diagnosis of subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE) was delayed due to the use of topical steroids on cutaneous eruptions before presentation in the clinic for biopsy. Diagnosis of SCLE can be difficult, especially for primary care providers who do not see the initial presentation regularly, as cutaneous findings can be variable in presentation. However, recurrent eruptions in similar photo-distributed locations should alert providers of a potential underlying diagnosis and prompt referral for dermatologic evaluation should be suggested. Thorough personal and family history should be taken and photographs of the rash should be documented in the patient's chart for future reference. Ultimately, biopsy is the gold standard diagnostic method for evaluating the etiology of new-onset rash. When there is suspicion of an underlying disease beyond idiopathic contact or irritant dermatitis, a biopsy should be considered as the next best step in management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.