Bleeding Risk During Colorectal Endoscopic Mucosal Resection With Continued Anticoagulant Therapy: A Multicenter Study.

Background and aims Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is a standard preventive method for colorectal cancer. Managing patients on anticoagulants during EMR is challenging because of balancing bleeding and thrombotic risks. Updated guidelines recommend continuing anticoagulants over heparin bridging; however, data on bleeding risks with continuing anticoagulants remain limited. This multicenter prospective study evaluated bleeding rates in patients who continued oral anticoagulants during EMR. Methods Patients on warfarin or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) undergoing EMR were enrolled from 12 tertiary hospitals. Warfarin was maintained on the day of EMR, while DOACs were paused on the day of EMR and resumed afterward. Post-EMR mucosal defects were closed with clips per protocol. Adverse events were monitored for 30 days. The primary endpoint was the major bleeding rate, defined as immediate bleeding requiring difficult hemostasis or delayed bleeding necessitating endoscopic intervention. The secondary endpoints were minor bleeding, other adverse events, and differences in bleeding rates between warfarin and DOACs. Results Among 107 patients (341 polyps; mean size = 6.7 mm), major bleeding occurred in five (4.7%) patients (95% confidence interval: 2.0%-10.5%), and all cases were managed endoscopically. Minor bleeding and thromboembolism events occurred in eight (7.5%) patients and one (0.9%) patient, respectively. No significant differences in bleeding rates were observed between warfarin and DOACs. Major bleeding rates were lower than those reported for heparin bridging. Conclusions Continuing anticoagulant therapy during EMR was associated with a low major bleeding rate (4.7%) and minimal thrombotic events, supporting its safety as an alternative to heparin bridging.