ArticleCureus2025
Rapid Proficiency in Femoral and Popliteal Nerve Identification Is Achievable After a Brief Educational Intervention.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Ultrasound guidance for the delivery of regional anesthesia in the emergency department (ED) is an area of increasing interest. However, in order to perform a regional nerve block, one must first be able to correctly identify the specific nerve on ultrasound. Therefore, the primary purpose of this study is to investigate the number of supervised ultrasound examinations required for an emergency medicine (ED) physician to gain proficiency in accurately identifying the nerves of the lower extremity at the level of the femoral and popliteal nerves. Methods The proficiency outcome was defined as the number of attempts a resident needed to locate and correctly identify the femoral and popliteal nerves for 10 consecutive examinations. Didactic education was provided via a one-hour lecture and two supervised hands-on ultrasound examinations for each region prior to testing. Count data are summarized using percentages or medians and ranges. Random effects negative binomial regression was used for modeling panel count data, with the results summarized as an incidence rate ratio (95% confidence interval) and P-values <0.05 considered statistically significant. Results Complete data for the number of attempts, confidence, gender, and years in practice was available for 31 residents. The median number of attempts and range for popliteal and femoral nerves were 0 (0-11) and 0 (0-11), respectively. The median level of confidence and range for popliteal and femoral nerves were 3.5 (1-5) and 3 (1-5), respectively. There was a significant association between confidence and proficiency (P=0.009) and between years in practice and proficiency (P=0.010). Conclusion The findings of this small data set would suggest that proficiency can be quickly obtained in identifying the femoral and popliteal nerves with ultrasound after only a few proctored examinations. A significant association was found between years in practice and proficiency. This suggests that physicians with previous ultrasound scanning experience may require fewer supervised examinations when learning how to identify the femoral and popliteal nerves.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.