ArticleCureus2025
Optimizing Surgical Outcomes: The Role of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols in Improving Recovery and Reducing Hospital Stays in Pakistan.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Application and research progress of the rapid rehabilitation concept in the perioperative gynaecological period.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) procedures are increasingly recognized for their ability to improve surgical outcomes and shorten hospital stays, particularly in resource-constrained environments like Pakistan. This study underscores the transformative potential of ERAS protocols in not only enhancing patient recovery but also optimizing healthcare resource utilization in such settings. The research aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of ERAS protocols in reducing postoperative complications and hospital stays among surgical patients in Pakistan, with a focus on their impact on overall recovery and healthcare efficiency. Methodology A prospective cohort design was employed, recruiting 400 adult patients aged 18 years and older undergoing elective surgical procedures from January to December 2023. Data on demographics, adherence to ERAS procedures, postoperative complications, duration of hospital stay, and recovery metrics were gathered before, during, and after surgery for participants who were split into ERAS and standard care groups. To compare results between groups, statistical procedures such as t-tests and chi-square tests were used. Results The ERAS group exhibited a significantly shorter mean length of hospital stay (3.52 ± 1.27 days) compared to the standard care group (6.29 ± 2.15 days, p < 0.001). Full recovery rates at 30 days, three months, and six months were significantly higher in the ERAS group, with 160 patients (80.0%), 178 patients (89.0%), and 191 patients (95.5%), respectively. In contrast, the standard care group showed recovery rates of 122 patients (61.0%), 147 patients (73.5%), and 164 patients (82.0%) at the same intervals. The ERAS group also had lower rates of postoperative complications, with 176 patients (88.0%) experiencing no complications compared to 152 patients (76.0%) in the standard care group, and lower readmission rates, with nine patients (4.5%) compared to 19 patients (9.5%) in the standard care group. Conclusion The successful implementation of ERAS procedures in Pakistan highlights their potential to improve healthcare efficiency by increasing surgical recovery and lowering hospital stays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.