Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39897298›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

No-Show Rates at a Plastic Surgery Clinic: Insights From Appalachian Healthcare Systems.

Armein Rahimpour, Emily Saurborn, Abigail Murphy, Jentre H Hyde, Andrew Weaver, Semeret Munie, Paul Bown, Rahman Barry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Armein RahimpourGeneral Surgery, Marshall University Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Huntington, USA.
Emily SaurbornGeneral Surgery, Marshall University Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Huntington, USA.
Abigail MurphyGeneral Surgery, Marshall University Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Huntington, USA.
Jentre H HydeGeneral Surgery, Marshall University Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Huntington, USA.
Andrew WeaverTrauma and Surgical Critical Care, Marshall University Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Huntington, USA.
Semeret MunieBariatric Surgery, Marshall University Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Huntington, USA.
Paul BownGeneral Surgery, Marshall University Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Huntington, USA.
Rahman BarryPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Marshall University Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Huntington, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMissed appointments, or "no-shows," occur when patients fail to notify the healthcare clinic of their inability to attend. No-show appointments place a significant burden on healthcare systems, costing clinics hundreds of thousands of dollars annually. Not only do patients miss out on receiving care, but prospective patients also face longer wait times due to appointment vacancies. This study aims to evaluate the factors associated with patient no-shows at a rural plastic surgery clinic.

methodsTwo-sample t-tests were used to compare age, BMI, weather temperature, and distance from the clinic between show and no-show groups. Chi-square tests of independence assessed the relationship between categorical variables- such as gender, clinic time (AM vs. PM), weather conditions, appointment type, insurance type, smoking status, and race- and appointment attendance. The Mann-Whitney U test analyzed the distribution of post-operative visit numbers between the show and no-show groups. To control for potential confounders, a multivariate logistic regression model was used to assess the independent effects of demographic, environmental, and procedural factors on no-show rates.

resultsThe mean age of patients in the no-show group was 40.73 years (SD = 14.08), compared to 42.85 years (SD = 12.48) for the show group. Higher no-show rates were significantly associated with male gender (p<0.01), impending weather (p<0.001), appointment type (new patient, pre-operative, post-operative) (p<0.001), and self-pay appointments (p<0.01). In addition, facial fracture follow-ups and facelift/blepharoplasty procedures showed significance (p<0.001). After adjusting for cofounders, male patients had significantly higher odds of missing their appointments compared to female patients (OR = 1.85, 95% CI: 1.12-3.06, p = 0.014). Post-operative patients were also more likely to miss appointments than new patients (OR = 1.92, 95% CI: 1.25-2.95, p = 0.003), while pre-operative patients showed an increased likelihood of no-show, though this did not reach statistical significance (OR = 1.45, p = 0.08). Weather conditions remained a significant factor after adjusting for other variables. Cloudy weather was associated with higher no-show rates compared to fair weather (OR = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.20-2.34, p = 0.002), whereas light rain did not significantly affect attendance (p = 0.38). Additionally, facial procedures were linked to significantly lower no-show rates compared to body contouring procedures (OR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.29-0.79, p = 0.004).  Discussion and conclusion: No-show rates are influenced by demographic and environmental factors. Male gender, insurance type, and weather conditions were significantly associated with higher no-show rates, while age, BMI, and distance from the clinic had mixed or non-significant associations. Future studies should explore the role of telemedicine in improving patient attendance in plastic surgery clinics.

Indexed as

appalachiaappointment adherenceno-show ratespatient engagementplastic surgery clinicspredictors of attendanceresource optimizationrural healthcare disparitiessocioeconomic barriers

Identifiers

PMID39897298
PMCPMC11787945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.