Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39897297›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Erbium-Doped Yttrium Aluminium Garnet (Er:YAG) Lasers in the Treatment of Peri-Implantitis.

Hani Almoharib

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Effect of the ErMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hani AlmoharibDepartment of Periodontics and Community Dentistry, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Erbium-doped yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG) lasers have emerged as a promising tool for the treatment of peri-implantitis, a pathological condition characterized by inflammation and bone loss around dental implants. Peri-implantitis, often associated with bacterial biofilms, leads to significant clinical complications, including pocket depth, bleeding, and pain. While traditional treatments such as mechanical debridement have shown limited effectiveness, Er:YAG lasers, with their high absorption by water, are believed to offer enhanced bacterial decontamination and tissue healing through photothermal effects. Studies indicate that Er:YAG lasers can reduce probing depths and improve biofilm removal, though the effects on clinical attachment levels and bone regeneration remain inconsistent. The use of Er:YAG lasers in peri-implantitis treatment is not without challenges, including risks of heat-related tissue damage, undertreatment, and technical limitations such as insufficient penetration into intricate implant surfaces. Additionally, the lack of standardized treatment protocols complicates the widespread adoption of this technology. Research highlights potential improvements when Er:YAG lasers are combined with other modalities, such as antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) and ultrasonic devices. Future advancements in laser technology, such as flexible fibers and optimized energy settings, may enhance their clinical application. Despite the promising results, further large-scale randomized controlled trials with extended follow-up periods are required to confirm the long-term benefits of Er:YAG lasers in peri-implantitis management, especially in terms of bone regeneration and bacterial control.

Indexed as

biofilm removaldental implantser:yag laserperi-implantitistissue healing

Identifiers

PMID39897297
PMCPMC11783336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.