Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39897248›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Estimating Future Obstetrics and Gynecology Workforce Needs in Japan.

Takashi Yoshimasu, Tasuku Inao, Isao Yokota

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Takashi YoshimasuDepartment of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, JPN.
Tasuku InaoDepartment of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, JPN.
Isao YokotaDepartment of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction The Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare of Japan (MHLW) introduced a regulation on physician overtime work in 2024, limiting overtime hours to a maximum of 960 annually. This regulation has raised concerns that the quality of medical care may decline. On the other hand, the shifting demographics of Japan, characterized by an aging population and declining birth rates, suggest a potential decrease in demand for obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) services in the future. In Japan, there is no feasible study regarding how many OBGYN doctors are currently lacking and how many of them will be necessary. Herein, we conduct simulations using Japanese insurance claims data to estimate the required number of OBGYN doctors. Methods This is a simulation study. We project future demand based on the current demand, working hours, and demographic changes. Using health insurance claims data, we estimate how many OBGYN doctors will be necessary in the future within the overtime work limit. Results The required number of doctors shows a declining trend that mirrors the declining population. Presently, there is a shortage of 1,500 doctors to comply with the 960-hour limit, and it is anticipated to be until 2040 or later before all doctors adhere to this limit. Several sensitivity analyses consistently support this trend. Conclusions Despite the existing shortage of obstetricians and gynecologists, future demands are expected to decrease. Inter-hospital and regional communication should be promoted for systemic innovations.

Indexed as

960-hour limitconcentration of hospitalsdemographicsobstetrician and gynecologistsimulation studywork style reform

Identifiers

PMID39897248
PMCPMC11785454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.