ArticleCureus2025
Vertebral Artery-Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery (PICA) Aneurysm Treated With the PICA-to-PICA Bypass: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Treating vertebral artery-posterior inferior cerebellar artery (VA-PICA) aneurysms poses challenges because of their complex anatomy. Although endovascular treatment is commonly preferred, direct surgery offers better recovery prospects than endovascular surgery aided by bypass techniques. We present a VA-PICA aneurysm case treated with VA internal trapping, using a PICA-to-PICA bypass without direct clipping. A 64-year-old man presented with complaints of severe headache and was diagnosed with a right VA-PICA wide neck aneurysm. The PICA originated from the neck of the aneurysm. We consulted an endovascular surgeon and opted for direct clipping via the transcondylar fossa approach. During surgery, we secured and followed the right VA, identified the PICA origin, and observed the proximal neck of the aneurysm. However, securing the distal VA was challenging because the dissector was inaccessible. Instead of direct clipping, a PICA-to-PICA bypass was selected following internal trapping. After anastomosis, the proximal PICA was occluded, whereas the small perforating artery was preserved. The next day, internal trapping of the right VA was performed. The patient's postoperative course was uneventful, except for mild dysphagia. Head magnetic resonance imaging revealed a small infarction on the right medulla. Three-dimensional computed tomography angiography revealed perfect PICA-to-PICA bypass patency. The patient was subsequently transferred to a rehabilitation hospital. The patient had no neurological symptoms at the six-month follow-up (Modified Rankin Score = 0). The preoperative feasibility of direct clipping of complex PICA aneurysms while preserving PICA is unpredictable. Various bypass methods, including the PICA-to-PICA bypass, are potential treatment options for complicated VA-PICA aneurysms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.