ArticleCureus2025
A Comparative, Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Delay of Relapse of Ceramide-Based Post-biotic Moisturizer Versus Paraffin-Based Moisturizer in Mild to Moderate Atopic Dermatitis.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Postbiotics in Dermatology: A Literature Review of Emerging Topical Therapies for Acne, Rosacea, and Eczema.Cureus · 2026Review
- Skin Allergy Research Society and Society for Eczema Studies Joint Task Force Guidelines of Care for Management of Atopic Dermatitis for Adults, Children, and Special Populations in India: An Evidence-Based Review and an Expert Consensus.Indian journal of dermatologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAtopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic relapsing inflammatory disease that impacts the quality of life of affected individuals as well as their families. Its pathogenesis involves impaired skin barrier function and immune dysregulation. Moisturizers are used in AD management as they help in repairing the skin barrier.
objectiveThe objective of this study was to compare the efficacy, safety, and prevention of relapse with ceramide-based post-biotic moisturizer against paraffin-based moisturizer in mild to moderate AD.
methodA total of 160 AD patients were grouped into two: Group I received desonide cream 0.05% and ceramide-based post-biotic moisturizer and Group II received desonide cream 0.05% and paraffin-based moisturizer. Both groups were given treatment for four weeks. Patients who achieved complete resolution entered the maintenance phase for a maximum duration of three months. They were followed up every two weeks telephonically or as and when the patient experienced a relapse.
resultsAll 160 patients were completely cured and entered the maintenance phase at week 4. A total of 96/160 (71.25%) patients relapsed, with 44 relapses in Group I (55%) and 52 (65%) in Group II (p=0.25). However, in terms of mean relapse time, Group I had a 72.52±15.01 day remission period, whereas Group II had a 47.44±21.49 day remission period (p=0.0001). Moreover, Group I showed a statistically significantly prolonged estimated median time to relapse compared with Group II (median: 85 days versus 71 days, p=0.05). Both moisturizers were tolerated very well.
conclusionAlthough both moisturizers were effective in resolving symptoms in the treatment phase, the ceramide-based post-biotic moisturizer was more effective and statistically significant in extending the remission period against the paraffin-based moisturizer in patients with mild to moderate AD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.