ReviewCureus2025
Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy: A Narrative Review of a Systematic Diagnostic Approach to Avoid Misdiagnosis.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy complicated by pre-eclampsia progressing to HELLP syndrome and pulmonary embolism: A case report.Case reports in women's health · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic inflammatory demyelination polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is a rare autoimmune neuropathy generated by cellular and humoral immune responses. Its course can be chronic, progressive, monophasic, or relapsing-remitting. Misdiagnosis and inappropriate therapy are common in CIDP. Given the scarcity of integrative information, we aimed to briefly summarize the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical phenotypes, diagnostic tools, and diagnostic criteria and provide a systematic diagnostic approach. We reviewed articles on Medline (PubMed) from 2018 to 2023, using Google Scholar to summarize the topics. The results are presented as a narrative review, in accordance with recommendations of the Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles (SANRA) guidelines. The included evidence showed that CIDP is a challenging neuropathy to diagnose and treat. Pathologic factors initiating typical CIDP and atypical CIDP are still clearly unknown. CIDP is diagnosed using the European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society (EFNS/PNS) criteria, which combine clinical features with electrophysiological evidence of demyelination. However, some patients need to fulfill the requirements. Another challenge is monitoring the disease progression and recognizing patients who do not respond to evidence-based first-line therapy to individualize their treatment. Based on the evidence, we conclude that 2021 EFNS/PNS guidelines allow for a more accurate diagnosis and treatment of CIDP and its variants. New diagnostic tools and molecular approaches are helpful in the diagnosis process but cannot replace clinical and electrodiagnostic criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.