ArticleEnvironmental science and ecotechnology2025
Explainable deep learning identifies patterns and drivers of freshwater harmful algal blooms.
Article in Environmental science and ecotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The escalating magnitude, frequency, and duration of harmful algal blooms (HABs) pose significant challenges to freshwater ecosystems worldwide. However, the mechanisms driving HABs remain poorly understood, in part due to the strong regional specificity of algal processes and the uneven data availability. These complexities make it difficult to generalize HAB dynamics and effectively predict their occurrence using traditional models. To address these challenges, we developed an explainable deep learning approach using long short-term memory (LSTM) models combined with explanation techniques that can capture complex patterns and provide explainable insights into key HAB drivers. We applied this approach for algal density modeling at 102 sites in China's lakes and reservoirs over three years. LSTMs effectively captured daily algal dynamics, achieving mean and maximum Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficients of 0.48 and 0.95 during testing phase. Moreover, water temperature emerged as the primary driver of HABs both nationally and in over 30% of localities, with stronger water temperature sensitivity observed in mid-to low-latitudes. We also identified regional similarities that allow for the successful transferability in modeling algal dynamics. Specifically, using fine-tuned transfer learning, we improved the prediction accuracy in over 75% of poorly gauged areas. Overall, LSTM-based explainable deep learning approach effectively addresses key challenges in HAB modeling by tackling both regional specificity and data limitations. By accurately predicting algal dynamics and identifying critical drivers, this approach provides actionable insights into the mechanisms of HABs, ultimately aids in the implementation of effective mitigation measures for nationwide and regional freshwater ecosystems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.