ArticleJournal of healthcare informatics research2025
Non-technical Skills for Urology Trainees: A Double-Blinded Study of ChatGPT4 AI Benchmarking Against Consultant Interaction.
Article in Journal of healthcare informatics research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in urological education: a systematic review.BMC medical education · 2026Pooled it
- The impact of AI precision feedback on college students' thinking shaping ability: mediating effect of intrinsic value identification and moderating role of critical consciousness transformation.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- AI-Based Assessment of Non-Technical Skills in Prehospital Simulations: A Comparative Validation Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Integrating non-technical skills into undergraduate medical simulation: a scoping review and thematic analysis of current practices.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-technical skills (NTS) are crucial in healthcare, encompassing cognitive and social skills that support technical ability. Traditional NTS training is evolving with the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) models that can intelligently converse with their users, known as large language models (LLMs). This study investigated the capabilities and limitations of a popular model named generative pre-trained transformer 4 (GPT-4) in NTS training, comparing its performance to that of human evaluators. Urology trainees identified NTS events in simulated scenarios and discussed them in blinded feedback sessions with AI and human consultants. Experts assessed the blinded interaction data, providing quantitative ratings and qualitative evaluations using annotated transcripts. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests compared pre- and post-intervention ratings, whilst Mann-Whitney
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.