ReviewHemaSphere2025
Diagnosis and treatment of AML in the context of WHO and ICC 2022 classifications: Divergent nomenclature converges on common therapies.
Review in HemaSphere, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- MOSAIC: Methylation-Oriented Site Analysis and Information Classifier for Robust Epigenomic Classification of Acute Leukemia in Clinical Cohorts with Variable Tumor Purity.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Integrated FHIT and IDH2 biomarker profiling predicts lethal sensitivity to DCPS inhibition in Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic syndrome.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Cell surface surprise: NPM1 is an immune therapy target for acute myeloid leukemia.HemaSphere · 2025Article
- What Is Acute Myeloid Leukemia?EJHaem · 2025Review
- Genetic Insights and Clinical Implications in the Diagnosis of Acute Myeloid Leukemia: An Updated Perspective.International journal of molecular and cellular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As a consequence of rapidly developing genetic technologies and advances in the understanding of the pathogenesis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), the classification of AML has moved gradually from a morphologic and cytochemical-based system to one that is genetically defined. Recent molecular and genetic developments have been integrated into the diagnostic criteria for AML in the fifth edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours and the 2022 International Consensus Classification (ICC) of Myeloid Neoplasms and Acute Leukemias, expanding the list of genetically defined entities. In this review article, we use a case-based format describing the diagnostic workup, risk stratification, and possible treatment options to highlight the impact of the 2022 WHO and ICC classifications on clinical practice. We show that despite much commentary and anguish, there is a significant overlap between the two classifications. We further highlight the fact that even for entities with divergent nomenclature, such as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.