Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39897058›Full record

ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2025

InTiCAR: Network-based identification of significant inter-tissue communicators for autoimmune diseases.

Kwansoo Kim, Manyoung Han, Doheon Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kwansoo KimDepartment of Bio and Brain Engineering, KAIST, Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea.
Manyoung HanDepartment of Bio and Brain Engineering, KAIST, Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea.
Doheon LeeDepartment of Bio and Brain Engineering, KAIST, Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inter-tissue communicators (ITCs) are intricate and essential aspects of our body, as they are the keepers of homeostatic equilibrium. It is no surprise that the dysregulation of the exchange between tissues are at the core of various disorders. Among such conditions, autoimmune diseases (AIDs) refer to a collection of pathological conditions where the miscommunication drives the immune system to mistakenly attack one's own body. Due to their myriad and diverse pathophysiologies, AIDs cannot be easily diagnosed or treated, and continuous efforts are required to seek for potential diagnostic markers or therapeutic targets. The identification of ITCs with significant involvement in the disease states is therefore crucial. Here, we present InTiCAR, Inter-Tissue Communicators for Autoimmune diseases by Random walk with restart, which is a network exploration-based analysis method that suggests disease-specific ITCs based on prior knowledge of disease genes, without the need for the external expression data. We first show that distinct ITC profile s can be acquired for various diseases by InTiCAR. We further illustrate that, for autoimmune diseases (AIDs) specifically, the disease-specific ITCs outperform disease genes in diagnosing patients using the UK Biobank plasma proteome dataset. Also, through CMap LINCS dataset, we find that high perturbation on the AIDs genes can be observed by the disease-specific ITCs. Our results provide and highlight unique perspectives on biological network analysis by focusing on the entities of extracellular communications.

Indexed as

Autoimmune diseasesInter-tissue communicatorsNetwork analysisRandom walk with restart

Identifiers

PMID39897058
PMCPMC11782887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.