Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39897057›Full record

ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2025

Machine learning methods for histopathological image analysis: Updates in 2024.

Daisuke Komura, Mieko Ochi, Shumpei Ishikawa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Comparative diagnostic accuracy of ChatGPT models in salivary gland disease: a multimodal vignette-based evaluation.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daisuke KomuraDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Mieko OchiDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Shumpei IshikawaDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The combination of artificial intelligence and digital pathology has emerged as a transformative force in healthcare and biomedical research. As an update to our 2018 review, this review presents comprehensive analysis of machine learning applications in histopathological image analysis, with focus on the developments since 2018. We highlight significant advances that have expanded the technical capabilities and practical applications of computational pathology. The review examines progress in addressing key challenges in the field as follows: processing of gigapixel whole slide images, insufficient labeled data, multidimensional analysis, domain shifts across institutions, and interpretability of machine learning models. We evaluate emerging trends, such as foundation models and multimodal integration, that are reshaping the field. Overall, our review highlights the potential of machine learning in enhancing both routine pathological analysis and scientific discovery in pathology. By providing this comprehensive overview, this review aims to guide researchers and clinicians in understanding the current state of the pathology image analysis field and its future trajectory.

Indexed as

Computer-assisted diagnosisDeep learningDigital image analysisFoundation modelHistopathologyMachine learningWhole slide image

Identifiers

PMID39897057
PMCPMC11786909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.