ArticlePostepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology2024
Zero-fluoroscopy approach for radiofrequency catheter ablation of left-sided, idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias - feasibility, efficacy, and safety evaluation.
Article in Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Catheter ablation (CA) is the standard treatment for patients with symptomatic, idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias (VAs): premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) or sustained/non-sustained ventricular tachycardia. Three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping (3D EAM) systems enable accurate mapping of cardiac arrhythmias and precise catheter guidance, eliminating the need for radiation exposure. However, fluoroscopy may be required to pass through the arteries, valve, or catheter positioning near critical structures. Aim: The study assessed the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of performing CA using a zero-fluoroscopy approach in patients with left-sided idiopathic VAs with the 3D EAM system. Material and methods: Fifty-three consecutive patients with left-sided, idiopathic VAs undergoing elective CA were enrolled. Procedures were performed using the CARTO 3D EAM system with the intention of eliminating fluoroscopy usage whenever possible. The primary endpoints were the feasibility of performing the procedure without fluoroscopy and the acute and long-term (minimum 6-month follow-up) procedural efficacy. Demographic and clinical baseline characteristics, procedure parameters, and complications were included in the analysis. Results: CA of left-sided VAs was performed without fluoroscopy in 44 out of 53 (83%) cases. Acute procedural success was achieved in 47 cases (88.7%). Long-term success was achieved in 45 cases (84.9%). Minor complications occurred in 3.7% of patients. No major complications were observed. Conclusions: CA guided by 3D EAM without fluoroscopy is feasible and safe for left-sided VA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.