Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39896962›Full record

ArticleThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global2025

ADP101 multifood oral immunotherapy for food-allergic patients: Harmony phase 1/2 randomized clinical trial.

Edwin H Kim, Warner W Carr, Amal H Assa'ad, Shaila U Gogate, Daniel H Petroni, Thomas B Casale, Mei-Lun Wang, Amy Sullivan, Amy M Archer, Ouhong Wang and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04856865 (A Phase 1/2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of ADP101 for Oral Immunotherapy in Food-Allergic Children and Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04856865 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

A Phase 1/2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of ADP101 for Oral Immunotherapy in Food-Allergic Children and Adults (The Harmony Study)

TypeinterventionalSponsorAlladapt Immunotherapeutics, Inc.Ran2021 to 2022Enrolled73ConditionsFood AllergyArmsLow dose ADP101, High dose ADP101, Pooled Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Edwin H KimDepartment of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC.
Warner W CarrAllergy & Asthma Providers of Southern California, Mission Viejo, Calif.
Amal H Assa'adCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Shaila U GogateColorado Allergy & Asthma Centers PC, Denver, Colo.
Daniel H PetroniSeattle Allergy and Asthma Research Institute, Seattle, Wash.
Thomas B CasaleUniversity of South Florida, Tampa, Fla.
Mei-Lun WangAlladapt Immunotherapeutics Inc, Menlo Park, Calif.
Amy SullivanAlladapt Immunotherapeutics Inc, Menlo Park, Calif.
Amy M ArcherAlladapt Immunotherapeutics Inc, Menlo Park, Calif.
Ouhong WangPointOH5 LLC, Boston, Mass.
Cheri Piscia-NicholsAlladapt Immunotherapeutics Inc, Menlo Park, Calif.
Lisa TuomiAlladapt Immunotherapeutics Inc, Menlo Park, Calif.
Olga Levin-YoungAlladapt Immunotherapeutics Inc, Menlo Park, Calif.
Ashley DombkowskiAlladapt Immunotherapeutics Inc, Menlo Park, Calif.
Dana McClintockAlladapt Immunotherapeutics Inc, Menlo Park, Calif.
Harmony investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Oral immunotherapy is an established approach to desensitize the immune system in the context of allergic disease; however, the only currently approved product is for peanut allergy. ADP101 is a novel, pharmaceutical-grade, multifood oral immunotherapy in development to simultaneously treat single or multiple food allergies, containing allergenic proteins from 15 foods in equal parts by protein weight. Objective: The phase 1/2 Harmony trial (NCT04856865) evaluated efficacy and safety of ADP101 in participants with qualifying allergy to 1 to 5 foods in ADP101, defined as dose-limiting symptoms with a ≤100 mg challenge dose during double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC). Methods: Participants were randomized to low-dose (1500 mg/d; 100 mg protein per food) or high-dose (4500 mg/d; 300 mg protein per food) ADP101, or matched placebo, with dose escalation followed by daily maintenance dosing over 40 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants tolerating a ≥600 mg challenge dose of a single qualifying food without dose-limiting symptoms at the Week 40 Exit DBPCFC (ie, responders). Results: In the primary analysis population (61 pediatric participants aged 4-17 years), a greater response rate was observed in both the high-dose ADP101 (55.0%) and low-dose ADP101 (38.1%) groups compared with pooled placebo (20.0%) (nominal Conclusions: The study did not meet its primary endpoint, but ADP101 demonstrated a favorable safety profile and increased the reactive threshold in DBPCFC in pediatric participants with single or multiple food allergies across multiple endpoints, warranting further clinical investigation.

Indexed as

allergy desensitizationclinical trialFood allergymultifood allergyoral immunotherapypediatric food allergy

Identifiers

PMID39896962
PMCPMC11786640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.