ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025
An interpretable machine learning tool for in-home monitoring of agitation episodes in people living with dementia: a proof-of-concept study.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Digital biomarkers for early agitation detection in dementia: a scoping review of emerging wearable and smart technologies for personalized care.Frontiers in neurologyPooled it
- Neuropsychiatric symptoms in Alzheimer's disease: Bridging mechanisms, management, and emerging innovations.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026Review
- Using Artificial Intelligence-Based Technologies for the Early Detection of Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia: Scoping Review.JMIR aging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Agitation affects around 30% of people living with dementia (PLwD), increasing carer burden and straining care services. Agitation identification typically relies on subjective clinical scales and direct patient observation, which are resource-intensive and challenging to incorporate into routine care. Clinical applicability of data-driven methods for agitation monitoring is limited by constraints such as short observational periods, data granularity, and lack of interpretability and generalisation. Current interventions for agitation are primarily medication-based, which may lead to severe side effects and lack personalisation. Understanding how real-world factors interact with agitation within home settings offers a promising avenue towards identifying potential personalised non-pharmacological interventions. Methods: We used longitudinal data (32,896 person-days from n = 63 PLwD) collected using in-home monitoring devices between December 2020 and March 2023. Employing machine learning techniques, we developed a monitoring tool to identify the presence of agitation during the week. We incorporated a traffic-light system to stratify agitation probability estimates supporting clinical decision-making, and employed the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) framework to enhance interpretability. We designed an interactive tool that enables the exploration of personalised non-pharmacological interventions, such as modifying ambient light and temperature. Findings: Light Gradient-boosting Machine (LightGBM) achieved the highest performance in identifying agitation over an 8-day period with a sensitivity of 71.32% ± 7.38 and specificity of 75.28% ± 7.38. Implementing the traffic-light system for stratification increased specificity to 90.3% ± 7.55 and improved all metrics. Key features for identifying agitation included low nocturnal respiratory rate, heightened alertness during sleep, and increased indoor illuminance, as revealed by statistical and feature importance analysis. Using our interactive tool, we identified indoor lighting and temperature adjustments as the most promising and feasible intervention options within our cohort. Interpretation: Our interpretable framework for agitation monitoring, developed using data from a dementia care study, showcases significant clinical value. The accompanying interactive interface allows for the Funding: This study is funded by the UK Dementia Research Institute [award number UK DRI-7002] through UK DRI Ltd, principally funded by the Medical Research Council (MRC), and the UKRI Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) PROTECT Project (grant number: EP/W031892/1). Infrastructure support for this research was provided by the NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) and the UKRI Medical Research Council (MRC). P.B. is also funded by the Great Ormond Street Hospital and the Royal Academy of Engineering. C.S. is supported by the UK Dementia Research Institute [award number UK DRI-5209], a UKRI Future Leaders Fellowship [MR/MR/X032892/1] and the Edmond J. Safra Foundation. R.N. is funded by UK Dementia Research Institute [award number UK DRI-7002] and the UKRI Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) PROTECT Project (grant number: EP/W031892/1). M.B. and A.K.S. are funded by the UK Dementia Research Institute [award number UKDRI-7002 and UKDRI-5209]. N.F.L., A.C., C.W. and S.K. are funded by the UK Dementia Research Institute [award number UK DRI-7002].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.