ReviewJournal of orthopaedics2025
Partial lateral patellar facetectomy is beneficial for patients with patellofemoral osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Surgical treatment for patellofemoral osteoarthritis (PFOA) consists of soft tissue, bony, and arthroplasty interventions. Partial lateral facetectomy (PLF) is a bone-reducing procedure, commonly done in conjunction with soft tissue and realignment procedures, that has grown in popularity after failure of conservative treatment due to its efficacy and minimally invasive nature. This systematic review and meta-analysis thus seeks to evaluate the efficacy of PLF in the absence of reviews on this topic. Methods: A systematic review of three databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus) was conducted, identifying studies that evaluated postoperative outcomes of PLF on patients who had PFOA. Pairwise meta-analysis was conducted between preoperative versus postoperative values of a subjective outcome measure (Knee Society Score (KSS)) and radiographic outcome measure (Congruence Angle (CA)). Subgroup analysis was performed on different concomitant procedures aside from PLF to determine their effect on clinical outcomes. Results: Ten studies were included in this review, with 463 patients and 495 knees and a pooled mean follow-up of 63.2 months and age of 56.3 years. Six studies investigated PLF with lateral release, two with realignment procedures, one with lateral lengthening, and one with both lateral release and realignment. Five studies found significant improvement (p < 0.01) in KSS (34.45; 95%CI: 26.41 to 42.49, and four studies reported significant improvement (p < 0.01) in CA (-10.31; 95%CI: 13.80 to -6.81). Subgroup analysis showed a significant difference in KSS between PLF with lateral release, lateral lengthening, and realignment (p < 0.01) but not for CA (p = 0.65). Conclusion: PLF is an effective treatment for PFOA using subjective and radiographic outcome measures. Current cohort studies have shown significant improvement in PFOA treatment, even in the context of long-term outcomes and severe PFOA, and provides valuable insight into the use of PLF as a viable minimally invasive surgical option to treat PFOA in addition to other procedures such as lateral retinacular release and realignment procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.