ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2025
Accuracy and learning curve of imageless robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Do image-based robotic TKR systems improve radiological or clinical outcomes compared to image-free systems? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Improved alignment accuracy but similar early clinical outcomes with NAVIO imageless robotic-assisted vs. conventional total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Pooled it
- Cost-utility analysis of robotic and conventional total knee arthroplasty: A 200-patient micro-costing study in a public sector institution.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Does technology increase the risk of stiffness after Total Knee Arthroplasty ? Evaluating the role of the learning curve.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Infection prevention in total knee arthroplasty: current concepts, controversies, and a clinical algorithm.European journal of translational myology · 2026Article
- Radiographic Accuracy and Consistency of Implant Placement Using the ROSALife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Learning curve for robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
- Efficacy study of robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty in patients with different levels of medical experience.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Learning curve of autonomous computer-assisted implant surgery systems for postgraduate dental trainees: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Dynamic joint balancing provides consistent gap prediction without a learning curve in robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- No Difference in Early Range of Motion Between CORI Robotic-TKA and Conventional-TKA: A Single-Surgeon Series.Arthroplasty today · 2025Article
- Robotics total knee arthroplasty: is an image-based the only solution?Frontiers in surgery · 2025Review
- The learning curve of novel implant total knee arthroplasty system in high-volume university center.SICOT-J · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is widely used to manage severe knee osteoarthritis. However, conventional TKA (C-TKA) often leaves patients dissatisfied due to suboptimal alignment and soft-tissue balance. Robotic-assisted TKA (RA-TKA), particularly with imageless systems like the NAVIO Surgical System, promises enhanced accuracy and improved outcomes. This study aims to validate the accuracy of RA-TKA in achieving functional alignment (FA) and to explore the learning curve associated with this technique. Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis included 101 patients undergoing RA-TKA with the NAVIO system from July 2021 to April 2024. Data on alignment angles, gap balance, and surgical times were analyzed. Patients were categorized by preoperative coronal alignment (valgus, neutral, and varus), with subgroups within the varus category. Accuracy was defined as deviations ≤3° for alignment and ≤1 mm for gap balance. Learning curve trends were analyzed using segmented regression. Results: The study demonstrated a mean alignment error of 1.18° (±1.21) and a gap balance accuracy of 84 %, with no significant differences across knee morphologies. The RA-TKA system achieved an overall implant alignment accuracy rate of 95 %. Varus knees with greater deformities (>6°) showed comparable or superior accuracy to less severe cases. Surgical time averaged 72.3 min (±5.6), with significant reductions observed after the first 11 cases, reflecting procedural efficiency improvements without compromising accuracy. Conclusion: The RA-TKA reliably achieves precise FA across diverse knee morphologies with a rapid learning curve. Future studies should evaluate long-term outcomes and implant survivorship to confirm these promising findings. Level of evidence: IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.