Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39896862›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2025

Accuracy and learning curve of imageless robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty.

Francesco Bosco, Giuseppe Rovere, Carmelo Burgio, Giorgia Lo Bue, Claudio Domenico Cobisi, Riccardo Giai Via, Ludovico Lucenti, Lawrence Camarda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Learning curve for robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Francesco BoscoDepartment of Precision Medicine in Medical, Surgical and Critical Care (Me.Pre.C.C.), University of Palermo, 90133, Palermo, Italy.
Giuseppe RovereDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Carmelo BurgioAdult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, 10021, New York, NY, USA.
Giorgia Lo BueDepartment of Precision Medicine in Medical, Surgical and Critical Care (Me.Pre.C.C.), University of Palermo, 90133, Palermo, Italy.
Claudio Domenico CobisiDepartment of Precision Medicine in Medical, Surgical and Critical Care (Me.Pre.C.C.), University of Palermo, 90133, Palermo, Italy.
Riccardo Giai ViaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Centro Traumatologico Ortopedico (CTO), University of Turin, Via Gianfranco Zuretti, 29, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Ludovico LucentiDepartment of Precision Medicine in Medical, Surgical and Critical Care (Me.Pre.C.C.), University of Palermo, 90133, Palermo, Italy.
Lawrence CamardaDepartment of Precision Medicine in Medical, Surgical and Critical Care (Me.Pre.C.C.), University of Palermo, 90133, Palermo, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is widely used to manage severe knee osteoarthritis. However, conventional TKA (C-TKA) often leaves patients dissatisfied due to suboptimal alignment and soft-tissue balance. Robotic-assisted TKA (RA-TKA), particularly with imageless systems like the NAVIO Surgical System, promises enhanced accuracy and improved outcomes. This study aims to validate the accuracy of RA-TKA in achieving functional alignment (FA) and to explore the learning curve associated with this technique. Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis included 101 patients undergoing RA-TKA with the NAVIO system from July 2021 to April 2024. Data on alignment angles, gap balance, and surgical times were analyzed. Patients were categorized by preoperative coronal alignment (valgus, neutral, and varus), with subgroups within the varus category. Accuracy was defined as deviations ≤3° for alignment and ≤1 mm for gap balance. Learning curve trends were analyzed using segmented regression. Results: The study demonstrated a mean alignment error of 1.18° (±1.21) and a gap balance accuracy of 84 %, with no significant differences across knee morphologies. The RA-TKA system achieved an overall implant alignment accuracy rate of 95 %. Varus knees with greater deformities (>6°) showed comparable or superior accuracy to less severe cases. Surgical time averaged 72.3 min (±5.6), with significant reductions observed after the first 11 cases, reflecting procedural efficiency improvements without compromising accuracy. Conclusion: The RA-TKA reliably achieves precise FA across diverse knee morphologies with a rapid learning curve. Future studies should evaluate long-term outcomes and implant survivorship to confirm these promising findings. Level of evidence: IV.

Indexed as

KneeOsteoarthritisRA-TKARoboticTKATotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID39896862
PMCPMC11779652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.