ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2025
Global trends in proximal femoral trabecular research: A bibliometric and visualized analysis.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Hip disease is a global public health issue, associated with high morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Although research on proximal femoral trabeculae has been conducted for over a century, no bibliometric analysis has been carried out. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the existing research landscape, identify emerging trends, and offer insights for future studies. Method: The scientific output related to the trabeculae within the human proximal femur from 2004 to 2023 was sourced from the Web of Science Core Collection. Moreover, both the annual publications and cumulative totals over this period were summarized in Excel. The VOS viewer was utilized to analyze co-authorship and co-citation relationship between authors, institutions, countries, references and journals. CiteSpace was used to cluster the keywords and research frontiers in this field. Results: A total of 365 publications were extracted, with the USA emerging as the primary contributor to this field, accounting for 133 publications with 5807 total citations, averaging 43.7 citations per publication. The Journal of Bone and Mineral Research has been identified as the most co-cited journal with a total of 1742 citations. The journals can be categorized into 5 distinct clusters, including medical imaging, orthopedic clinical research, research on endocrine and metabolic related diseases, human evolution and anatomy related research, biomechanics and modeling. The keyword with the highest co-occurrence frequency is "bone mineral density". The keywords were stratified into six clusters, including DXA, bone remodeling, diagnosis, titanium alloy bionic cannulated screws, individual trabecula segmentation, and QCT. More recently, the focus has expanded to three-dimensional modeling, falls, microarchitecture, and avascular necrosis. Conclusions: Evaluation of proximal femoral strength can be improved by combining structural parameters with bone mineral density by DXA or QCT. Three-dimensional analysis, microarchitecture, and bionic implants are emerging as significant areas of focus and trends for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.