ReviewJournal of orthopaedics2025
Psychological readiness of return to sport after arthroscopic Bankart repair: A systematic review.
Review in Journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Surveys such as the Shoulder Instability-Return to Sport after Injury (SIRSI) scores can help identify athletes who are better prepared to return to sport (RTS) after arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR). Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review was to clarify how psychologically ready athletes are to RTS after ABR, with the secondary purpose of evaluating the impact of psychological readiness on athletes' ability to RTSS after ABR. Methods: The Ovid Medline, PubMed, and SportDiscus databases were searched from inception until January 2023 using keywords such as Bankart, anterior labral repair, shoulder stabilization, return to play, and return to sport. Original studies were included if both RTS outcomes after ABR and a psychological factor were reported, with potential psychological factors being psychological readiness to RTS and reasons of failing to RTS. Results: Overall, 707 studies were screened and 16 met criteria for inclusion. The mean MINORS score of included studies was 13.3 ± 4.1. In patients who failed to RTS, most (74 %) patients failed due to recurrent shoulder instability, pain, or injury, while 26 % reported failing to RTS due to non-shoulder related causes such as apprehension and fear of reinjury. Eight studies evaluated post-operative SIRSI scores with a mean of 65.4 (95 % CI: 62.9-72.8) at an average of 5.4 years post-operatively. Conclusion: Most athletes fail to RTS due to shoulder-related causes, with apprehension and fear of reinjury as common causes as shoulder-independent causes for failed RTS. The mean SIRSI score after ABR was 65.4, and athletes with higher post-operative SIRSI scores were more likely to RTS. Level of evidence: IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.