Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39896847›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025

Danielle M Sosnicki, Alexander J Travis, Pierre Comizzoli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Danielle M SosnickiDepartment of Reproductive Sciences, Smithsonian's National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, Washington, DC, United States.
Alexander J TravisBaker Institute for Animal Health, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Pierre ComizzoliDepartment of Reproductive Sciences, Smithsonian's National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, Washington, DC, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have previously reported a difference in the composition of epididymal extracellular vesicles (EVs) between normospermic and teratospermic domestic cats. The objective of the present study was to investigate whether the fertilizing ability or developmental potential of sperm from teratospermic cats could be improved after incubation with EVs isolated from normospermic cats. For each of 11 experimental replicates, pools of EVs were collected from the whole epididymides of 5 normospermic cats (normospermic EVs). Spermatozoa were also collected from the cauda epididymides of 2 teratospermic cats, pooled, and half was co-incubated with normospermic EVs for 1 h and 15 min prior to using the sperm for

Indexed as

developmental potentialdomestic catepididymisextracellular vesiclesspermteratospermia

Identifiers

PMID39896847
PMCPMC11783848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.