Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39896816›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2024

The prognostic value of circulating tumor DNA in malignant melanoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lei Liu, Shufu Hou, Aiping Zhu, Bing Yan, Linchuan Li, Dandan Song

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Circulating Tumor DNA as a Biomarker for Melanoma Prognosis and Therapy.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Promising immunotherapeutic treatments for colon cancer.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lei Liu *Department of Neurology, Shandong Provincial Third Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Shufu Hou *Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Central Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.
Aiping Zhu *Department of Neurology, Shandong Second Provincial General Hospital, Jinan, China.
Bing YanDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Central Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.
Linchuan LiDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.
Dandan SongDepartment of Neurology, Shandong Provincial Third Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is an emerging biomarker in malignant melanoma(MM), and high levels of ctDNA may reflect a higher tumor load. However, its prognostic value for MM receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICI) remains controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to elucidate the prognostic significance of ctDNA in this patient population. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of the PubMed, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and EMBASE databases, including studies published up to August 15, 2024, to investigate the prognostic impact of ctDNA in MM patients treated with ICI. Using a fixed-effects model, we systematically evaluated the association between ctDNA levels and key survival outcomes, including overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Additionally, funnel plots, Begg's test, and Egger's test were employed to assess potential publication bias. Results: Twelve studies from eleven articles, involving a total of 1063 eligible MM patients receiving ICI therapy, were included. The results indicated that patients with detectable ctDNA before initiating ICI therapy had significantly poorer OS (HR = 3.19, 95% CI = 2.22-4.58, P < 0.001) and PFS (HR = 2.08, 95% CI = 1.61-2.69, P < 0.001). Furthermore, the detectability of ctDNA during treatment was also significantly associated with worse OS (HR = 4.57, 95% CI = 3.03-6.91, P < 0.001) and PFS (HR = 3.79, 95% CI = 2.13-6.75, P < 0.001). Conclusions: This meta-analysis indicates that in MM patients receiving ICI therapy, detectable and high levels of ctDNA are significantly associated with poorer OS and PFS. Therefore, ctDNA can serve as a diagnostic and stratification tool prior to treatment, as well as an effective indicator for monitoring treatment response and disease progression. Systematic Review Registration: www.inplasy.com, identifier INPLASY2024110018.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsMelanomaSkin NeoplasmsHumansPrognosisTreatment OutcomeBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAImmune Checkpoint Inhibitorscirculating tumor DNAimmune checkpoint inhibitorsmalignant melanomaoverall survivalprogression-free survival

Identifiers

PMID39896816
PMCPMC11782251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.