ReviewAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2025
Best evidence for rehabilitation management of urinary incontinence in patients with bladder cancer following orthotopic neobladder reconstruction.
Review in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Summary of the best evidence for whole-course nutritional management of bladder cancer.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- Specialized Nursing-Led Interventions for Bladder Cancer Management: A Scoping Review of Evidence and Clinical Outcomes.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to establish the best evidence for the rehabilitation management of urinary incontinence (UI) in patients with orthotopic neobladder (ONB) following radical cystectomy (RC) for bladder cancer, providing a theoretical foundation for clinical practice. Methods: A systematic search was conducted across evidence-based databases, guideline networks, and professional association websites to identify relevant literature on rehabilitation management for patients with ONB after bladder cancer surgery. Studies published in both English and Chinese, up to May 8, 2024, were included. Trained researchers assessed the quality of the literature and summarized the evidence. Results: Fourteen documents were included, consisting of eight guidelines, two clinical decision documents, and four expert consensus reports. A total of 43 pieces of evidence were identified, covering seven key areas: preoperative UI assessment and counseling, preventive measures, UI assessment and diagnosis, conservative treatments, selection and use of nursing equipment, evaluation of effectiveness, and follow-up care. Conclusions: The best evidence for UI rehabilitation management after ONB for bladder cancer can help standardize patient care and clinical practices. Healthcare providers should adapt this evidence to their local healthcare settings, cultural contexts, barriers, and patient preferences. Systematic review registration: This study was conducted following the evidence summary reporting specifications of the Fudan University Center for Evidence-Based Nursing (Registration No. ES20244165).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.