ArticleSustainable cities and society2025
Reducing the social inequity of neighborhood visual environment in Los Angeles through computer vision and multi-model machine learning.
Article in Sustainable cities and society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dynamics of street environmental features and emotional responses in urban areas: implications for public health and sustainable development.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aligning with the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals, the focus on creating safe, sustainable cities and enhancing the wellbeing of individuals across all age groups has become a central aspect of urban planning and environmental management. The environments we live in significantly influence our thoughts, emotions, and interactions with the world around us. Our study aims to unveil the social inequity of citizens' wellbeing, reflected by their perception on neighborhood environment (e.g., feeling of depression), across different social/vulnerable groups (i.e., White, Black, Asian, Hispanic, low-income, low-educated, and unemployed) via crowdsourced street view imageries and computer vision. Specifically, we quantified the actual built environment in the 5D dimensions (i.e., density, diversity, design, distance, and destination) based on multiple sources; measured six types of neighborhood visual environment (i.e., perception of beautiful, safe, wealthy, liveable, boring and depressing) and the overall neighborhood soundness index by using computer vision technique and street view imageries collected from Mapillary; and unveiled the actual built environmental features that are associated with people's visual perception towards the surrounding environment via multi-model machine learning methods. Our pilot study in Los Angeles County finds that neighborhoods with higher concentrations of Black, Hispanic, low-income, low-educated, and unemployed populations are perceived as less beautiful, liveable, safe, and wealthy. The most important actual built environment features positively influencing human perception include the density of canopy, followed by the density of multiple units, the distance to CBD, and car commuting to destinations, regardless of social groups. Our key findings provide place-based evidence for the design and upgrading of the community environment that further affects people's daily activity and living style. Our framework and methods can be applied to cross-disciplinary studies, aiding urban planning and healthy city initiatives with place-based evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.