ArticleJPRAS open2025
Antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of fistulae in cleft palate repair: A quality improvement study.
Article in JPRAS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prophylactic Antibiotic Therapy in Cleft Surgery-A Scoping Review.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- Rational utilization of antibiotic prophylaxis in oral and maxillofacial surgery: a large scope review of recent data.BMC oral health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Post-operative infection following cleft palate repair can lead to wound dehiscence and subsequent fistula formation. To prevent this, many surgeons advocate using post-operative antibiotic prophylaxis. The use of antibiotics in children is not without risks and with limited published data and variability both countrywide and in our unit, we wanted to address this research question. Objective: To assess fistula rates and whether the provision of antibiotics post-operatively affected the incidence of oronasal fistula formation in patients with cleft palate. Methodology: We performed an institutional retrospective study using data from patients undergoing primary palatoplasty between August 2021 and August 2022. These patients were divided into 2 groups. Group A included patients who received antibiotics only on induction and Group B additionally received post-operative antibiotic prophylaxis for 7 days. All participants (97) were evaluated for incidence of post-operative fistula formation. Results: There was no evidence to suggest a difference in the fistula rate between the different timings of antibiotic regimen in Cycle 1; on induction + 2 intravenous doses (Group A) P = 0.807 and 7 days post-operatively (Group B) P = 0.820. Also, in cycle 2 there was no difference in the fistula rates between the 2 groups; P = 0.546 for Group A and P = 0.571 for Group B. Conclusion: Our study suggests that the use of antibiotics post-operatively does not influence the formation of post-operative fistulae in cleft palate. This calls for a national randomised controlled study to answer this research question and achieve standardisation of practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.