ArticleJPRAS open2025
Efficacy of pectoralis nerve blocks I & II with liposomal bupivacaine in patients undergoing elective breast reduction procedures: A retrospective study.
Article in JPRAS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Liposomal bupivacaine after reduction mammaplasty: is it worth the shot? A single-blind, breast-split randomized clinical trial.JPRAS open · 2026Article
- Intraoperative Local Anesthesia and Opioid Use in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery-based Breast Reduction.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Research progress of liposomal bupivacaine and its value in perioperative pain management.JPRAS open · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The pectoral nerve (PECs) block I and II nerve blocks with liposomal bupivacaine (LB, Exparel) are used for postoperative analgesia in breast surgery, but evidence on efficacy for breast reduction is limited. We examined the effect of the PECS I and II blocks with LB on perioperative opioid use and pain scores compared to no block and blocks with plain local anesthetic (LA). We hypothesized that patients receiving a block with LB would require lower opioid amounts. Methods: This retrospective cohort analysis included 120 patients undergoing breast reduction from 2011-2023. Patients received: no block, PECs block with plain LA, or PECs block with LB. Primary outcomes were intraoperative, Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU), and outpatient opioid requirements. The secondary outcomes were PACU pain scores. Results: Forty patients had no block, twenty-six received plain LA block, and fifty-four received LB block. For intraoperative opioids, LB block significantly lowered use compared to no block. PACU opioid use showed no differences between groups. For outpatient opioids, both LB and plain LA blocks significantly lowered use compared to no block. No significant pain score differences were found between groups. Conclusions: Patients receiving the PECS block had decreased outpatient narcotic requirements compared to those patients who did not get the block. Patients receiving PECS block with LB had the further benefit of having decreased intraoperative narcotic requirements compared to the other groups. This highlights the potential benefit of performing the PECS block for patients undergoing breast reduction surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.