Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39896658›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Contributions of distinct attention mechanisms to saccadic choices in a gamified, dynamic environment.

Evan A Kattner, Terrence R Stanford, Emilio Salinas

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Evan A KattnerDepartment of Translational Neuroscience, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, 1 Medical Center Blvd., Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1010, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-2591-9721
Terrence R StanfordDepartment of Translational Neuroscience, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, 1 Medical Center Blvd., Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1010, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0759-5599
Emilio SalinasDepartment of Translational Neuroscience, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, 1 Medical Center Blvd., Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1010, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7411-5693

Funding

CTSA UM1 Program at Wake ForestUM1TR004929 · NCATS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Jamy D Ard, KRISTIE L FOLEY · 2024 to 2026
$11.9M
CRCNS: investigating perceptual processing speed and its impact on choice behaviorR01EY025172 · NEI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SALINAS, EMILIO, STANFORD, TERRENCE R · 2016 to 2024
$3.6M
A computational framework for attention during urgent choicesR21MH120784 · NIMH · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SALINAS, EMILIO, STANFORD, TERRENCE R · 2019 to 2020
$426k
NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004929NEI NIH HHS R01 EY025172NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH120784
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visuospatial attention is key for parsing visual information and selecting targets to look at. Based on regimented laboratory tasks, it is now well established that three types of mechanism determine when and where attention is deployed; these are stimulus-driven (exogenous), goal-driven (endogenous), and history-driven (reflecting recent experience). It is unclear, however, how these distinct attentional signals interact and contribute in visual environments that are more akin to natural scanning, when stimuli may change rapidly and no fixation requirements are imposed. Here, we investigate this via a gamified task in which participants (male and female) make continuous saccadic choices at a rapid pace - and yet, perceptual performance can be accurately tracked over time as the choice process unfolds. The results reveal unequivocal markers of exogenous capture toward salient stimuli; endogenous guidance toward valuable targets and relevant locations; and history-driven effects, which produce large, involuntary modulations in processing capacity. Under dynamic conditions, success probability is dictated by temporally precise interplay between different forms of spatial attention, with recent history making a particularly prominent contribution.

Identifiers

PMID39896658
PMCPMC11785244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.