ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Distinct mechanisms for panoramic and landmark-based view integration in human scene-selective cortex.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To encode a cognitive map of an environment, a navigating agent must be able to integrate across disparate perceptual views corresponding to the same place. There are two ways that this can be done. First, the agent might integrate across the panorama of views obtainable at a single vantage point. Second, they might integrate across views of a distal location containing a landmark that is visible from multiple vantage points. Guided by previous work, we tested the hypothesis that these two viewpoint-integration processes would be mediated by different neuroanatomical substrates. Male and female human participants were familiarized with a route through a virtual city, along which they closely viewed 24 storefronts that were pairwise associated, either by being located on different buildings directly across the street from each other (same-panorama condition) or by being located on different sides of the same building facing different streets (same-landmark condition). They were then scanned with fMRI while viewing the storefronts in isolation and performing a spatial memory task. Multivoxel pattern analysis revealed a functional distinction between two scene-selective regions: the retrosplenial complex (RSC) showed a significant association effect for same-panorama storefronts, whereas the parahippocampal place area (PPA) showed a significant association effect for same-landmark storefronts. Panoramic association effects were also observed in several other dorsal-stream regions within the medial and lateral parietal lobe. These results demonstrate the existence of two neural mechanisms for integrating across views to represent places as either the observer's location (same panorama) or the observed location (same landmark).
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.